<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Harry Mnemonic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.harrynomics.com/feed/?" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.harrynomics.com</link>
	<description>Data, computers, cyberpunk &#38; Tech for 200AD</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Debt Prevention - Ways to Avoid Going into Debt</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/debt-prevention-ways-to-avoid-going-into-debt/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/debt-prevention-ways-to-avoid-going-into-debt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In today&#8217;s economic times, debt prevention is vital and every penny that you have in your possession is important. Knowing how to effectively manage your money is more important than ever. Your ability to do this can have a tremendous impact on your ability to stay financially afloat. There may not be much you can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right"><img src="http://sharedlog_ai.s3.amazonaws.com/220px-BicyclePlymouth_878.png" alt="Debt Prevention - Ways to Avoid Going into Debt"></div>
<p>In today&rsquo;s economic times, debt prevention is vital and every penny that you have in your possession is important. Knowing how to effectively manage your money is more important than ever. Your ability to do this can have a tremendous impact on your ability to stay financially afloat. There may not be much you can do about the national state of economic affairs, but you can control the money that you have. This is important no matter how much or <span id="more-271"></span>how little you have. It is extremely important to make sure that you don&rsquo;t spend more than you have. In other words, make sure that you are conscience of debt prevention and are avoiding debt at all costs, if you want more information on this, contact <a href="http://findfinancialadvisors.co.uk/">financial advisers uk</a>.</p>
<p>Have an emergency fund. Figure out the amount of money you need for living expenses for about six months. Make it your goal to put that amount into your savings account. This is a difficult task for many people to do. But with discipline and determination, it can be done. Save as much money as you can from each paycheck, even if it&rsquo;s just a few dollars. If you consistently put away a certain amount from each paycheck into your savings without spending any of it, you will be amazed at how quickly the money will accumulate. Your emergency fund will give you a financial cushion if you should face a job loss, or an unexpected expense.</p>
<p>One way to assure debt prevention is to not use credit cards. A general rule of thumb to follow is this: if you don&rsquo;t have enough money to purchase something, then you can&rsquo;t afford it. Use cash only to buy things. That way, you will pay for everything you buy right at the moment of purchase. This will keep you from building debt. If you use credit cards, you are spending money that you haven&rsquo;t earned up. Then you will create a debt that will exceed the purchase price. The interest on your credit card will only add to your debt and make it harder for you to pay it off.</p>
<p>Debt prevention starts with a good budget for yourself. Determine the amount of money that you will have to spend to pay for your living expenses each month. Stick to your budget. Keep track of every penny that you spend, even if you just buy a pack of gum. This will let you see where your money is going. It will also allow you to cut back on the things that you are wasting money on and don&rsquo;t really need. Put any additional extra money into your savings account. For example, let&rsquo;s say you have a $300 a month car payment, and you will make your final payment the following month. Once you pay the car off, take the $300 that you previously used for your car payment and put it into your savings. Do this with each bill that you pay off. This way, you are increasing the money that you pay to yourself. By doing this, you are securing a good financial future, assuring debt prevention and will have money to spend at your own leisure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/debt-prevention-ways-to-avoid-going-into-debt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Much More</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/much-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/much-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This may sound a bit harsh, but I believe it to be true: about 90% of people on earth don&#8217;t care in any way about climate change, global warming, and how the planet is affected by carbon emissions. That&#8217;s not to say they don&#8217;t think about these things to a large extent, but, as we [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right"><img src="http://sharedlog_ai.s3.amazonaws.com/need_to_talk_420.png" alt="Much More"></div>
<p>This may sound a bit harsh, but I believe it to be true: about 90% of people on earth don&rsquo;t care in any way about climate change, global warming, and how the planet is affected by carbon emissions. That&rsquo;s not to say they don&rsquo;t <i>think </i>about these things to a large extent, but, as we all know, <i>thinking</i> about getting a new job is a fair bit different to actually <i>looking</i> for a job and getting the ball rolling. And <span id="more-267"></span>what a big job cleaning our planet up is&ndash;It&rsquo;s understandable that we brush it to one side. If only we had a carpet big enough&ndash;But let&rsquo;s not speak too soon, the way some oil moguls think that could be the next big thing they&rsquo;re working on&#8230;</p>
<p>I suppose the reason why we don&rsquo;t care enough is obvious: we can&rsquo;t really see the effects, and the planet is so huge that the effects, though massive, often go unnoticed. In other words, it&rsquo;s a massive game of Chinese whispers on a planetary scale. The end result is that nobody knows who to believe&#8230; </p>
<p>You would think that with that being the general attitude there wouldn&rsquo;t be any companies out there fighting the environmental cause other than <i>Greenpeace</i>. Well, that&rsquo;s where you&rsquo;re wrong. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.eniginpartner.com/products-solutions/enigin-portfolio.php">Enigin</a> are so much more than just another company saying and not doing. They actually have products! Not only that, but they explain about what they actually do on their site, so you don&rsquo;t have to feel all bewildered and embarrassed when you sit with your mates in the pub and someone brings up how to save money on lighting&ndash;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/much-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is the UK&#8217;s Economy Under Threat</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/is-the-uks-economy-under-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/is-the-uks-economy-under-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However, this increase will likely be a temporary growth and it is believed that it will not last in the long run, according to the BCC, who pointed out that a double-dip recession will not be avoided in the near future. Although this may seem bleak, many experts believe that the future of the United [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Although the United Kingdom is currently suffering from their worst deficit, the British Chamber of Commerce (BCC) is expecting an economic growth in 2011 of 2.1 percent, with a 2.3 percent increase in 2012. Compare this to the 1 percent growth predicted for 2010, and there may be reason for optimism. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">However, this increase will likely be a temporary growth and it is believed that it will not last in the long run, according to the BCC, who pointed out <span id="more-265"></span>that a double-dip recession will not be avoided in the near future. Although this may seem bleak, many experts believe that the future of the United Kingdom&rsquo;s economy is still in question and is by no means certain to suffer, part of this conclusion could be drawn on the rise of <a href="http://www.equity-release-centre.co.uk/">home equity release</a>. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">According to the BCC, economic recovery is expected to slow in this year&rsquo;s first quarter due to a rise in VAT as well as weather related issues, the gross domestic product is expected to rise as a result of stimulus packages and a rise in equity prices. These are the short term solutions. For long term solutions, it is believed that without a reduction in personal debt, a cut in the national debt, and without strengthening the state of banks, the state of the nation&rsquo;s economy will continue to be limited.</p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">The Treasury seems rather optimistic, with a prediction of ￡163 billion in borrowing for 2010-11. The BCC on the other hand are considerably less optimistic, with a realistic prediction of ￡140 billion. This discrepancy is one of the many causes for the lack of economic growth and security. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Job creation and the need for successful businesses are essential in forcing economic growth in the long term, and although the recession is over, the need for vigilance is more important now than it was before.</p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">For these reasons it would be difficult at this time to say that the economy is under serious threat. It may be facing some serious challenges which requires some very serious and firm decisions to be made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/is-the-uks-economy-under-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Governments Control Inflation</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/how-governments-control-inflation/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/how-governments-control-inflation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Inflation is a serious concern to many concerned citizens. They feel the need to educate themselves on the subject, since it has a direct impact on their daily lives. Citizens are becoming more aware and conscientious. 
Governments can control inflation in several ways. First is through fiscal policy. That is to say, they manage aggregate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">One of the principal duties of a government is to control the nation&rsquo;s economy. Inflation is one of the more difficult duties for a government to conduct because the decisions they must make are usually unpopular with the people.</p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Inflation is a serious concern to many concerned citizens. They feel the need to educate themselves on the subject, since it has a direct impact on their daily lives. Citizens are becoming more aware and conscientious. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Inflation results when the cost <span id="more-261"></span>of production causes an increase in consumer prices, or when there is an increase in wage costs. For example, a factory decides to increase employee wages but do not increase the amount of production. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Governments can control inflation in several ways. First is through fiscal policy. That is to say, they manage aggregate demand by means of government spending. To reduce inflation, they decrease the amount of expenditure while increasing taxes. This is very unpopular with citizens. This is because when taxes are increased while decreasing expenditure, less money is put into other social programs, such as health care and welfare. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">The other popular form of control is through monetary policy. This form of control, which is used by the Conservative Party in UK, places great importance on controlling interest rates. By doing so, the government is able to restrict increases in either employee wages, or the prices of consumer prices, even things like the rates of <a href="http://www.equity-release-centre.co.uk/">equity release schemes</a>. Although this pleases the common consumer, this is not a popular strategy in the eyes of merchants. There are two ways to conduct monetary policy: direct and indirect. In regards to direct monetary policy, the government strictly controls employee wage rates as well as consumer prices. On the other hand, indirect monetary policy is conducted with suggestions as opposed to rules. In other words, they request a stoppage of wage increases and the price of consumer products as opposed to creating strict policies without consulting corporations or the citizenry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/how-governments-control-inflation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taxation - the big squeeze</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/taxation-the-big-squeeze/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/taxation-the-big-squeeze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=257</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
2009 was the year of the banker - yes I said &#8220;banker&#8221;! We started the year with the expectation that these paragons of our society would see the error of thier ways and re-invent themselves. Perhaps it would be a return to the &#8220;greyheads&#8221;of decades past. A time long gone when the bank manager was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right"><img src="http://sharedlog_ai.s3.amazonaws.com/dollar-toliet-paper_543.png" alt="Taxation - the big squeeze"></div>
<p>2009 was the year of the banker - yes I said &#8220;banker&#8221;! We started the year with the expectation that these paragons of our society would see the error of thier ways and re-invent themselves. Perhaps it would be a return to the &#8220;greyheads&#8221;of decades past. A time long gone when the bank manager was a pillar of society and a denison of the local community. Surely these mega institutions would revert to the golden age and we could start <span id="more-257"></span>looking up to them again?</p>
<p>Well how wrong we were. The year, indeed decade, ended and the new one started with the news reports full of the proposed massive bonuses that these people wanted to pay themselves. Not swayed by a proposed windfall tax on bonuses they went ahead and awarded themselves vast sums anyway!</p>
<p>And who is to pay - we all know the answer - the taxpayer. The tax take is higher now than at any time in the last 30 years and we have the pospect of a new budget in the next couple of weeks that can only see an increase of this burden on the population of this downtrodden nation we misguidedly call &#8220;Great Britain&#8221;. We are taxed on our income, taxed on our purchases (I understand taxing luxeries like <a href="http://www.dotmaison.com/reed-diffusers_c_2_m_0_ct_2846.html">reed diffusers</a>, but will they really slap some on food?!), taxed when we try to give some to help our children through higher education (which we now have to pay for - unlike our politicians when they were going through it) and taxed when we die!</p>
<p>We have to ask the question - Why do the government need so much of our hard earned money? What do they do with it? Perhaps the time has come for the state to contract and realise that they cannot run everything. Currently the average worker in this country is spending two days a week effectively working for the government. Undoubtedly that will soon become three. Communism failed in the 1980s but maybe this is the way it will eventually win - born out of the capitalist system!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/taxation-the-big-squeeze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ACME plc - End of Year Results - Let&#8217;s talk the language of business</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/acme-plc-end-of-year-results-lets-talk-the-language-of-business/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/acme-plc-end-of-year-results-lets-talk-the-language-of-business/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The End Of Year results for ACME plc have just been published - turnover up 23% at £3.5bn, net profit (before tax) up 26% to £524m this will result in a dividend increase to shareholders of 16% or up to £1.25 per share. CEO (Mr. B. Bunny) and CFO (Mr. D. Duck) reported that the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The End Of Year results for ACME plc have just been published - turnover up 23% at £3.5bn, net profit (before tax) up 26% to £524m this will result in a dividend increase to shareholders of 16% or up to £1.25 per share. CEO (Mr. B. Bunny) and CFO (Mr. D. Duck) reported that the company has shown impressive growth over the last year and the future looks bright as animated products are being more sort after in all geographical <span id="more-255"></span>and economic areas of the world. </p>
<p>Majority shareholders, Lord Warner and his brothers, will share a dividend of more than £300m and have seen their net worth rise by more than 33% to over £4bn on the back of the bouyant share price.</p>
<p>These results will disappoint maverick shareholder Mr. P. Pig who heads up a group of investors intent on bringing the global warming problem into the boardroom. To this end Mr. Pig has published his own set of End Of Year results which show that ACME plc has increased it&rsquo;s annual energy consumption by 21% whilst CO2 output has risen a stagering 28%. Interviewed this morning live on television Mr. Pig pointed out that although cartoon characters like himself, Mr. Bunny and Mr. Duck do not need oxygen to live and that if the atsmosphere of the world were entirely CO2, their lives would be pretty much unaffected , they must think of the wider issue. &#8220;The whole purpose of a cartoon character&rsquo;s life is to provide entertainment for the carbon based, oxygen breathing individuals who read our stories and watch us in all sorts of media. ACME plc should remember this and consider that if they do not control CO2 output there will be no market left!&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. Pig accepted that their most skilled operatives need to keep cool in their working environment and that air conditioning was a prerequisite. &#8220;Of course the cartoonists need to keep cool&#8221;he stated &#8220;but lets make ACME plc install systems that are at the very least the most <a href="http://www.eniginadvice.com/2009/11/25/enigin-the-best-way-to-chill-out/">energy efficient</a> that they can find.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/acme-plc-end-of-year-results-lets-talk-the-language-of-business/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does government spending help in a time of economic crisis?</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/does-government-spending-help-in-a-time-of-economic-crisis/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/does-government-spending-help-in-a-time-of-economic-crisis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Firstly, the benefits of government spending, as believed by Keynesian economists, are twofold. 
2) increasing the amount of consumer consumption. In a time of economic crisis, consumers tend to be concerned and wary about buying new high end products, such as automobiles and homes. By stimulating the economy by creating social programs (hence creating jobs), [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">This question is a very heated debate amongst global economists, and it is not an easily answered question, for there are benefits and detriments to government spending during a time of economic crisis. The situation will depend largely on the position the country is in.</p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Firstly, the benefits of government spending, as believed by Keynesian economists, are twofold. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">1) Economists who believe that government spending is beneficial to, and can overcome an economic crisis believe that by spending money on <span id="more-253"></span>social programs will create new jobs, hence fueling and stimulating the economy. This is done by </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">2) increasing the amount of consumer consumption. In a time of economic crisis, consumers tend to be concerned and wary about buying new high end products, such as automobiles and homes. By stimulating the economy by creating social programs (hence creating jobs), consumers are more likely to spend their money, therefore adding a greater amount of capital into the national economy. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">These beliefs are under the auspice that government spending is in the form of government investments, such as infrastructure investments and the creation of social programs, stimulating job creation. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">However, the negatives to government spending in a time of economic crisis are equally as impressive. Many classical economists who oppose government believe that if the government increases the average spending, the resources will be placed outside the power of the private sector. These classical economists believe that the private sector is productive for stimulating the economy while the public sector (the government) is unproductive and ultimately counterproductive for the stimulation of the economy. These same economists theorize that this kind of additional government spending was the fundamental cause of the Great Depression.</p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">There is no clear answer to this heated debate. While some theorize that government spending will stimulate the economy by creating new jobs through social programs and other government investments, others believe that this kind of spending will actually cause nations to fall deeper into an economic crisis. </p>
<p align="left&quot;style="TEXT-ALIGN: left; MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt">Speaking of economics, I have been looking into the so called &#8220;<a href="http://www.eniginpartner.com/">enigin scam</a>&quot;at length. From what I can see, it is a completely legit industry and it bothers me that some people who have not held up thier end of the deal and therefore lost money are blaming a company which is providing a very needed and innovative service. It is very interesting however to look at, I will attempt to further update you in future posts.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/does-government-spending-help-in-a-time-of-economic-crisis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fears of a Greek debt crisis deepens</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/fears-of-a-greek-debt-crisis-deepens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/fears-of-a-greek-debt-crisis-deepens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is currently a lot of pressure being placed on the government of Greece by the market and also some governments of the European Union to get some control over its growing deficit. There has also been some degree of social unrest in Greece over this same problem including strikes by government workers.
Should Greece default [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 145%; MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto">There is currently a lot of pressure being placed on the government of Greece by the market and also some governments of the European Union to get some control over its growing deficit. There has also been some degree of social unrest in Greece over this same problem including strikes by government workers.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 145%; MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto">Should Greece default on its loans then that would have a serious effect on the euro and how strong it remains in the future. Yet the European <span id="more-247"></span>Union and the Geek government have both come out claiming that a default is not likely. The belief here is that the Greeks can definitely fix the problem and this would involve some very sharp cutbacks and the creation of a much more competitive economy.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 145%; MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto">But this optimism does not seem to be reflected in the minds of its people. Strikes that have occurred and were planned include the tax and customs officers strike that in effect shut down certain aspects of the country&rsquo;s trade and business industries and not to mention denying the government well need revenue. There are many other strikes and walk outs that are likely to occur in the coming weeks and months if the situation does not improve for workers in the country. </p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 145%; MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto">The government has made its pledge to reduce the country&rsquo;s budget deficit from its current 12.7% of GDP to 2% by 2013. But the governments plan includes a pay freeze from government workers and an increase in the retirement age. There is also a planned <a href="www.energysavingblog.com/">fuel tax</a> hike.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 145%; MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto">The plan set forth by the Greek government is been endorsed by the EU, which sees it is achievable. Yet the market does not seem to be too impressed with the Greek government&rsquo;s plan. There are still some unanswered questions such as where the government will find the funds to support itself and its programs if the capital market has been very weary to provide it.</p>
<p style="LINE-HEIGHT: 145%; MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt; mso-margin-top-alt: auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto">Greece can access funds and technical advice from the International Monetary Fund but the EU has said that this would not be needed. Yet the speculation continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/fears-of-a-greek-debt-crisis-deepens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do We Really Need Recessions</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/do-we-really-need-recessions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/do-we-really-need-recessions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=245</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
A recession can be a tough time for many especially in this era of advanced technology and connected economies, a fall in one country can affect the whole world. Many believe that we do not need recessions. If this is the case then businesses that fail should never be allowed to happen and change needs [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right"><img src="http://sharedlog_ai.s3.amazonaws.com/globe_257.png" alt="Do We Really Need Recessions"></div>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal;">A recession can be a tough time for many especially in this era of advanced technology and connected economies, a fall in one country can affect the whole world. Many believe that we do not need recessions. If this is the case then businesses that fail should never be allowed to happen and change needs to be suppressed. </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal;">What appears more logical and near to what the truth is, is that a major recession, or depression should be avoided. Sometimes <span id="more-245"></span>allowing a small recession might do a world of good. This will allow any economy to go through its cycles with just a few sectors down and suffering. While a few businesses feel the pinch, the other sectors in the economy could make up for lost production. </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal;">Governments and many central banks find it easy to avoid small recessions. But this is not without the risk of having a bigger recession sometime down the line. Its only human nature to stop any suffering that might be foreseeable in the short term and this causes the problems. With this in mind, we can safely assume that we will not see an end to dramatic rises and falls in the global economy. </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal;">We might think that the worst of the global credit crunch is behind us, and that the dramatic lows of 2008 will not be reached during our lifetime. However with the mentality that we have there is no way we can guarantee that there will not be another depression. The next one could be on a giant scale, causing more damage then ever before. What might cause that to happen is yours to guess. There are a number of triggers that could spell doom and one of the main ones has to do with the possible tightening of monetary policy in China. </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 10pt; line-height: normal;">Recession are apart of life. It&rsquo;s how we handle things that will determine our short term economic success. </p>
<p>You all know, I on occasion look into online businesses as a matter of interest and I have recently found a organisation that does online <a href="http://www.octopus-hr.co.uk/">human resources software</a>. To have all applicable people logged into the central program seems like a really convenient idea to me, also a useful time saver, I am slightly intrigued why this is the first time it is getting to be a big thing. However in the recession I think that it is proven to be a big saving for many businesses because it takes away the need for about 5 positions in a company..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/do-we-really-need-recessions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama Taxes Wall Street Excess!</title>
		<link>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/obama-taxes-wall-street-excess/</link>
		<comments>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/obama-taxes-wall-street-excess/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.harrynomics.com/?p=241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
During these times of economic recession, public anger on both sides of the Atlantic has turned to &#8217;greedy bankers&#8217; and what is seen as the obscene level of bonuses that are still being paid to the very people who have received opprobrium for creating the recession initially. If there is one thing that a politician [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="float:right"><img src="http://sharedlog_ai.s3.amazonaws.com/obama_293.png" alt="Obama Taxes Wall Street Excess!"></div>
<p>During these times of economic recession, public anger on both sides of the Atlantic has turned to &rsquo;greedy bankers&rsquo; and what is seen as the obscene level of bonuses that are still being paid to the very people who have received opprobrium for creating the recession initially. If there is one thing that a politician on any side of the spectrum likes it is siding with public opinion and President Barack Obama&rsquo;s plans outlined today in a hard hitting speech <span id="more-241"></span>will find heavy support amongst his core voters and even amongst Republicans who are being bitten by a deepening financial crisis.</p>
<p>Whilst in many ways the problems that President Obama is facing are inherited ones, such was the wave of euphoria that greeted his election that people generally expected him to make an immediate positive impact upon the US economy. In contrast however, the turn of this year produced a string of indicators far gloomier than anticipated. Unemployment was up again in December 2009, by 85,000, to reverse a slight drop in November and the expect consumer spending at Christmas time failed to materialise with a 0.3% drop in retail sales in December, from November, surprising all analysts and leading to predections of a longer climb from recession than had been anticipated.</p>
<p>It is against this backdrop that President Obama has hit out at the banks that received unprecedented state help when the recession struck. A controversial TARP (Troubled Assett Relief Program) bailed out struggling banks to the tune of $250billion, with the money coming from the taxpayers pockets at a time when they were feeling the pinch. Whilst TARP was successfull in preventing further financial giants following the path of Lehman Brothers and AIG the public have been horrified by the bonus culture continuing unabated.</p>
<p>It had been widely anticipated that President Obama would announce a $90billion tax on banks but today he went further and announced a $117billion levy on financial institutions whose assets are in excess of $50billion. Around 50 companies are likely to be affected, including the Stateside operations of groups such as Barclays and RBS.</p>
<p>In a surprisingly aggressive speech the President refused to pull his punches telling the banks: &#8220;We want our money back and we&rsquo;re going to get it!&#8221; and &#8220;My commitment is to recover every single dime that the American people are owed&#8230; my determination to achieve this goal is only heightened when I see reports of massive profits and obscene bonuses at the very firms who owe their continued existence to the American people.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whilst this will raise cheers from the American populace it casts a further gloom over the banks themselves and in the short term the banks may seek to recoup this levy by raising the cost of borrowing. It may yet turn out that the money that the fat cat banks pay back may once again come from the pocket of Joe Citizen!</p>
<p>Really exciting news about the new company that we are starting, I just talked to this amazing site who agreed to give us a sweet deal on the <a href="http://www.c-s-v.co.uk/">Bespoke Packaging Boxes</a>, check out the work in thier portfolio and see what you think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.harrynomics.com/2010/08/30/obama-taxes-wall-street-excess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

